I had a go at the DPR challenges for a while, a long time ago. One of the reasons why I dropped out was that the challenges seemed to be an exclusive "mates club" for a bunch of pro's with a bazillion dollars worth of high end gear and no-one else stood a chance. The other aspect was the voting system, which was accused of being rigged on many occasions.
Could I suggest try to be inclusive, as far as possible. Or possibly develop a "handicap system" (like that used in sailing and horse races) to bias it against those using high-end gear, or placing in the top-10 too often.
Could I suggest try to be inclusive, as far as possible. Or possibly develop a "handicap system" (like that used in sailing and horse races) to bias it against those using high-end gear, or placing in the top-10 too often.
