G
Guest
I recently acquired what was supposed to be a 50mm f/1.5 Carl Zeiss Sonnar #18xxxxx (a late Stuttgart Zeiss lens for the Contax RF). Sending it off to a trusted expert for repair of separation of the center triplet I was surprised to be told that the lens was a high quality Soviet forgery from the days of the Contax IIa.
Now I am familiar with the Jupiter 3 and the mount was like no Jupiter 3 I have ever seen – it was heavy high quality chromed brass. My expert said anomalies in the letter “a†in the names Carl and Sonnar, thread count in the mount, a yellow tint to the coating, the use of a double front and rear bezel, and the width of the aperture ring pointed to a forgery.
As I said I know the Soviet stuff quite well so I was really fooled. Does anyone know about late 1950s and 1960’s Zeiss lenses forged in the Soviet Union? Could changes in the late Sonnars account for this diagnosis?
Now I am familiar with the Jupiter 3 and the mount was like no Jupiter 3 I have ever seen – it was heavy high quality chromed brass. My expert said anomalies in the letter “a†in the names Carl and Sonnar, thread count in the mount, a yellow tint to the coating, the use of a double front and rear bezel, and the width of the aperture ring pointed to a forgery.
As I said I know the Soviet stuff quite well so I was really fooled. Does anyone know about late 1950s and 1960’s Zeiss lenses forged in the Soviet Union? Could changes in the late Sonnars account for this diagnosis?