DPR Forum

Welcome to the Friendly Aisles!
DPRF is a spin-off of dpreview. We are a photography forum with people from all over the world freely sharing their knowledge and love of photography. Everybody is welcome, from beginners to the experienced professional. From smartphone to Medium Format.

DPRF is a community for everybody, every brand and every sensor format. Digital and film.
Enjoy this modern, easy to use software. Look also at our Reviews & Gallery!

SD14 Sensor Cleaning

Excellent info Steaphany thanks!
Here's a question for you, why do digital slr cameras need shutters in the first place? Wouldn't it be easier to just have the sensor act as it's own shutter? And you'd be able to achieve way faster "shutter" speeds than with any mechanical means, right?
Thanks again!
 
Mechanical shutters are not needed, but the choice of designing a camera with an electronic versus a mechanical shutter is up to a companies marketing and engineering teams.

For example, video cameras all employ electronic shutters. The reason being the nature of the images that the camera captures, video. Many specialty high speed and ultra high speed cameras use electronic shutters since a mechanical shutter can not respond fast enough. Cameras with live view or lacking a viewfinder requiring framing through the LCD screen use an electronic shutter or if they also have a mechanical shutter, it's kept open and only actuated during the actual exposure.

A feature of the Foveon imager employed by the SD14 but never implemented in the design by Sigma is the ability to capture video:

Fx17-78-F13D Product Brief (pdf)

So, think of the SD14 as having both an electronic shutter in the imager and a mechanical shutter.

Another aspect of relying solely on an electronic shutter is the imager is always being exposed to the light captured by the lens. If the Sun is within the field of view, then all that light is being focused onto very sensitive electronic elements. Have you ever used an magnifying glass to burn a leaf or piece of paper ? With in seconds, you get a nice plume of smoke. Just imagine that happening in your SD14 ? On another photography web site, I once read the panicked post from a photographer whose dSLR had literally gone up in smoke from Sun damage. I do not recall the model camera so I can not say what shutter design it used.

I remember watching the Moon landing coverage when an astronaut inadvertently aimed the live transmission video camera at the Sun. It lasted only a moment, but the camera was destroyed and useless. The remaining exploration of the Moon of that mission had no live video.

This does not mean that a mechanical shutter eliminates the risk of Sun damage, whether constructed of metal or plastic, focused Sun light can deform and damage a shutter, especially when the shutter is at the focal plane as in the SD14.

Another factor on choosing a shutter design is the philosophy behind the features and performance. If you ever visited Sigma's SD14 web site, they describe the SD14 as putting photographic control back into the hands of the photographer - as what was originally available in analog film based photography. I'm sure this contributed to their choice of employing a mechanical shutter.
 
I'm not sure the exact reason for having a mechanical shutter any more honestly.

I've read many Nikons actually have a hybrid shutter. The shutter operates up to something like 1/150 or 1/250, and then the electronics take over. So the shutter is still going at 1/250 even when you are taking that 1/2000 shot. I know the SD14 doesn't do this, and I don't think many of the higher end Canons do either.

This is why on Nikons you can have a flash connected to the PC sync and take flash pics with stupidly high shutter speeds. On the SD and Canons you will get a portion of the frame unlit due to the shutter (1/250 is the fastest you can go on the SD14 btw)

edit: and what she said, haha.
 
I never even thought about that! Foiled by the sun again! lol.
I'll keep thinking, I'm sure I'll find something to stump you with Steaphany...

Here's something nifty that I thought was very cool, since we're talking about shutters and Nikon.
http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-04/925
 
Hi folks,
back to topic please.
Although it an interesting discussion on shutters, it´s off topic.
Please feel free to open another thread on shutters.
Regards
Uwe
 
Back
Top