DPR Forum

Welcome to the Friendly Aisles!
DPRF is a spin-off of dpreview. We are a photography forum with people from all over the world freely sharing their knowledge and love of photography. Everybody is welcome, from beginners to the experienced professional. From smartphone to Medium Format.

DPRF is a community for everybody, every brand and every sensor format. Digital and film.
Enjoy this modern, easy to use software. Look also at our Reviews & Gallery!

SEA North End

1971_M5

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
358
A follow-up of sorts to the earlier "South End" picture... figured I'd post these before they got too old and dry. It was a nice afternoon, so I grabbed the camera and drove to the airport. Luckily, there was some decent action. I used the 200-500. Being some distance away, you need to be in the 350mm to 500mm range to (kind-of) fill-up the frame... but trying to fil the frame, as you're tracking, sometimes the tail fin or elevator might get cut-off. So, there's some throw-aways. Plus, you always need to crop a little bit to get things balanced. I use the Flightradar24 app to get a sense of what's coming down the runway (to be ready) - so that's a big plus compared to the old days. It's fun to watch (and stand in the sunshine with the camera). Still, this is predictable and much easier than "real" birds - my hat is off to the true BIF shooters who have way more patience and skill.

alaska-737-max9-small.jpg

SEA - PDX

ana-787-small.jpg

SEA - NRT

delta-767-small.jpg

SEA - HNL

qatar-777-small.jpg

SEA - DOH

virgin-787-small.jpg

SEA - LHR
 
Here's a link to a higher-res pic... good IQ with the 200-500. Higher shutter speeds are preferable. There is a noticeable difference in output (fuzziness) if you drop below 1/1000. And if you try to compensate by sharpening (too much) in post, you get a halo around the perimeter of the airplane.

virgin-787-small by John Frantzen, on Flickr
 
Last edited:
Back
Top