DPR Forum

Welcome to the Friendly Aisles!
DPRF is a spin-off of dpreview. We are a photography forum with people from all over the world freely sharing their knowledge and love of photography. Everybody is welcome, from beginners to the experienced professional. From smartphone to Medium Format.

DPRF is a community for everybody, every brand and every sensor format. Digital and film.
Enjoy this modern, easy to use software. Look also at our Reviews & Gallery!

Worst and Best Lens

D

davidfung

Just going through the many threads in this forum and others, I have noticed that there are many varied opinions about the best lenses. I wish to conduct a survery with this thread. The idea of this, is to nominate the best and worse Contax Zeiss lens that you HAVE USED. Would like to keep it focused on that. Hopefully, this would provide users with more information regarding people's experiences. Please don't put down your views or opinions, just the best and worst.
 
What do you mean by "Best" and "Worst" ? Optical quality ? Usability ? Something else ? How shall I measure e.g. the optical quality ? There is a lot of the photographer's personality in such a Voting. So what do expect me to answer ?

To your Info: I use or used the following CZ-Lenses: 2.8/25, 2.8/35, 1.4/35, 2.8/85, 1.4/85, 3.5/200. They are such different !

Matthias
 
YES there are problems but everyone can measure him/herself ...

For me I only have to call the 2.8/28 the Best Zeiss lens. I have the 2.8/35 new and have the 1.4/50 and 2.8/135 (both good) none of them to call bad. I have tried some Zeiss lenses for Rolleiflex : The Planar 1.8/50 is VERY GOOD (perhaps just my copy) the 1.4/85 and the 1.4/35 can't be compared with "normal" lenses but they are very good too.

After all : The 2.8/28 is the best (my opinion) - and that what I have read from many other : Pictures are just blowing you away !

;-) Paul
 
My vote for the best lens is the 85mm f 1,4 (German made).

I cannot nominate a bad Zeiss lens as my experiences with them have all been positive.

Rob
 
The 85mm1/4 is, by far, my favorite or "pet" lens ... not the the best lens optically ... but certainly one of the most gorgeous and sexy-looking lenses I have ever seen. I think the 85mm/1.2 may be even better ... but how many of us even get a chance to look at one!

The best lens that I have, optically, is probably the 28mm/2.0.

I've heard that the 25mm/2.8 is not quite as good a lens optically, compared to all the Zeiss lenses, and it's not even a true 25mm - it's closer to 26mm - and therefore really cannot justify the higher price. I can vouch for the 28mm/2.8 ... a really superb lens ... and I have a 30 x 40" print to prove it!
 
To all the people who own the 85mm/1.2 ..... I HATE YOU!
happy.gif
 
Just as an opinion, not to start a war::::

The worst lens I have is the 28 2.0.
I wouldn't trade it and use it rather regularly. It's the only tool for the job. Soft at 2.0, gotta be careful of flair, (time for a lens hood) but lets me shoot faster.

The best lens I use is the 85 1.4. Best thing going for portraits, low light, far from sharp, open, but produced the finest shots I've printed.
Latest ex&le http://www.wojosmojo.net/gih/34.htm
Joe W
 
Sorry, to clarify, I was referring to personal choices as to the best and worst lens. There are heaps of discussions on technical quality and the alikes, but what I want to know is what are the 'people's choice' when it comes to best and worst. In that regard, worst does not mean optically bad, but just a lens that you consider to be not as good as the otheres. If that makes sense...
 
Back
Top