DPR Forum

Welcome to the Friendly Aisles!
DPRF is a spin-off of dpreview. We are a photography forum with people from all over the world freely sharing their knowledge and love of photography. Everybody is welcome, from beginners to the experienced professional. From smartphone to Medium Format.

DPRF is a community for everybody, every brand and every sensor format. Digital and film.
Enjoy this modern, easy to use software. Look also at our Reviews & Gallery!

Zeiss lenses on 20D

L

ltsdnce

Have any 20D owners mounted zeiss lenses on the camera? What adaptor would you use? I know there are several out there, from Shell, cameraquest, and zoerk...are these all about the same?
Thanks for your help,
Susan
 
> I would also be interested in Zeiss lenses for the 10D. I have a Hasselblad Zeiss 80mm plus several Zeiss lenses from my Contax. I think I read somewhere a while ago that Zeiss could be used with an adapter, but I don't > remember which adapter.

Anne B.

>
 
I have recently purchased a 20D, having used Contax and T* lenses for 20 years, and am using the Cameraquest adapter to enable my Zeiss lenses to be utilised.

The results are variable, from slightly difficult to absolutely stunning.

I have the 21mm f2.8, 25mm f2.8, 50mm f1.7, 100mm f2.8 Makro Planar, 28-85mm f3.3-4 and the 100-300mm f4-5.6.

Firstly I would say that the quality of engineering and ease of the use of the Cameraquest adapter are excellent. No tools required and no slack or wobble experienced. It's expensive at US$175, but worth the money.

The problems I have found are mainly difficulty in focussing accurately at distance. The screeen on the 20D is obviously designed primarily for autofocus so there are no focussing aids like split screen etc. The screen is also a little dark, which adds difficulty when using the 100-300mm at the long end at f5.6.

The aperture stop down is not automatic, so stopping down to f11 gives a very dark screen. You have to focus wide open and then stop down to take the picture (if required).
I seems that the slight thickness of the adapter means that infinity focus is not actually at the infinity mark on the lens (you're moving the lens a couple of mm away from the sensor plane), so the scale becomes less useful. I'm sure with tests one could find out the exact focus point and place a new mark (removable of course!) on the lens barrel.

The results though are worth the effort as quality digital cameras tend to reveal flaws in lenses, and the quality of Zeiss really shows through.

The results with the 100mm Makro Planar in particular are nothing short of amazing. I was genuinely astonished after interpolating a 1:1 image up to 30"x20". Just stunning quality, sharpness and detail like you wouldn't believe, and of course that undefinable richness that only seems to come with Zeiss T* lenses. It is better than with any film I have used.

I have come to the conclusion that I shall keep certain lenses, notably the 21mm, 50mm and 100mm Makro, but use canon at the telephoto end.
Canon's telephoto lenses are excellent (I have the 70-200mm f2.8 IS USM and is it superb, I have also ordered a 300mm f2.8 IS which is also reputed to be extraordinarily good). You get quality lenses with the benefit of very fast autofocus and wide apertures.

However, Canon's wide angle lenses are nothing in comparison with Zeiss and this is why I shall keep the 21mm T* along with an RTS body and use film when I want the full 21mm (the 1.6 crop factor on the 20D makes it about a 33mm), but the quality is so much better than the Canon 17-40mm f4(which has shown some chromatic aberration and is nowhere near as sharp).

The Makro Planar could not be beaten by anything from what I've seen, and autofocus is not really required for macro work as I tend to move the camera in and out to focus, so this is a definite keeper and will probably be the most used combination (if you don't have one get one, you will not be disappointed).

Anyway I've rambled. Feel free to ask if there is anything specific you want to know.
Cheers,
Matt
 
Bit of a non-sequeteur but...
I would steer clear of micro drives. Moving parts are never as reliable as solid state technology such as compact flash.
I've heard of people losing important work with a crashing micro drive.
 
Matt, this is a bit of overstatement. Haven't you heard of people loosing information because of crashing solid-state CF cards? Well, I am the one. Microdrives have their drawbacks, but if you handle them with reasonable care, they do deliver.
Speaking of Hitachi, one ofmy students shoots Canon 1Ds with Hitachi microdrive, and everything seeems swell. Canon battery is so powerful and power management is so efficient that we did not notice any degradation in battery life.
 
Hi Irakly,
I hadn't heard of crashing CF cards actually, but now I have (I've only recently moved to digital). Was the information recoverable using image rescue software?
P.S. You're right about those Canon batteries - they go on forever.
 
>I had a CF card crash on me a couple of weeks ago and the only programme >that would cope was Photo Rescue .www.regsoft.net

>The trial programme is available free but to save any recovered pics you >have to pay around $34 US. Well worth it as I recovered all 64 pics ...Stuart
 
Most image rescue software works well with jpeg images, but sometimes errs on raw files. Once I shot a job with 10d, and CF card crashed. It was in Russia, on a tour with a theatre. I managed to find internet access and downloaded sandisk software. It recovered all files but one, which was the most important.
 
Back
Top