DPR Forum

Welcome to the Friendly Aisles!
DPRF is a spin-off of dpreview. We are a photography forum with people from all over the world freely sharing their knowledge and love of photography. Everybody is welcome, from beginners to the experienced professional. From smartphone to Medium Format.

DPRF is a community for everybody, every brand and every sensor format. Digital and film.
Enjoy this modern, easy to use software. Look also at our Reviews & Gallery!

Contax N Digital

> Irakly,

I looked at that image again and the reason I suggested that it was a bit flat was that whites s/b white and blacks s/b black. On my monitor the contrast is not coming throught like it is for your male model. Might be my monitor (an LCD on a notebook).

Michael.
 
LCD displays are known for their struggle to reproduce real blacks and shadow detail. Only tubes for me so far ...
 
> Djg - you should try the new Apple 23" cinema HD display... panels > dont get any better and it is VERY close to the sony CRT i have for > colour and contrast. Antony
 
The latest Apple LCDs have intrigued me and are probably the only current temptation. Seeing as I have a dual-head system, we're looking at around $5K including graphics card
uhoh.gif
. The Canon 1Ds Mk II is going to be way before that ...

Thrifty DJ
 
> I too work dual head - or at least i used to - i discovered that with > one widescreen HD display, I actually preferred the uninterrupted > experience over dual screen. and if you can get 2 x 23" screens and a > gfx card for $5000 then i think you are doing pretty well - the 23" HD > screen in the UK is the equivalent of $3500.
sad.gif
 
For those in a tight budget, the 20D also perform well in hi ISO, and noise level is low in shadow area. I believe they all use the same image processing engine. I don't think the 20D has ISO 3200 though.

Marc, What is you take on using the 1DsMKII vs. a 16meg digital back?
 
Don't know yet Albert. But I suspect the MF back will still prevail. The sensor is still much larger than the 1DsMKII.
 
Antony, I run two 22" NEC CRTs at 1792x1344 each, so basically two HD monitors. The 23" Apple Cinema HD LCDs run 1920x1200 - a bit wider and a biter shorter. I actually lose a tad in area if I go with the Apple LCD. BTW they run around $2000US this side of the Pond. Still not cheap
sad.gif
.
 
> djg, ahh well nothing for it then! you'll have to get a 30" (or two) >
wink.gif
 
Yes, that would be the way to go. I did check them out. Though obviously a lot thinner and lighter, they're 27" wide, about 8" wider than my current monitors, too wide for my current physical setup. So for now the 23s would be the way to go. I'm considering them because my monitors are several years old and starting to show it, much like me
biggrin.gif
.
 
Back
Top