hinojosa22
New Member
I have a Contax T2 that seems to get significant shadows when using the flash (especially with Red Eye reduction). Does anyone have this problem too? Any suggestions on how to deal with this issue? Thanks
DPR Forum
Welcome to the Friendly Aisles!
DPRF is a spin-off of dpreview. We are a photography forum with people from all over the world freely sharing their knowledge and love of photography. Everybody is welcome, from beginners to the experienced professional. From smartphone to Medium Format.
DPRF is a community for everybody, every brand and every sensor format. Digital and film.
Enjoy this modern, easy to use software. Look also at our Reviews & Gallery!
Contax T2 Flash Shadows
- Thread starter hinojosa22
- Start date
jsmisc
Well-Known Member
Hello David,
I have a T2 which I bought many years ago. It has been an excellent camera. My only criticism is that it can vignette a bit sometimes although I only notice it as a slight darkening of the corners on pictures of blue skies and I find that this can actually enhance a picture.
I have not had any problems with the flash which to me does an excellent job considering its low power. I cannot remember the guide number. It is good for automatic fill in flash too and I haven't had any problems with unwanted shadows apart from the usual effect of using direct flash on e.g. a subject in front of light coloured wall. I don't find this to be too much of a problem with it.
The only problem with the anti-red eye mode which I find is that people, including me as taker of the picture, can move in the time between the two flashes and when the camera actually makes the exposure and this can cause movement blur.
I don't think that there is any solution to the general problem of harsh shadows from direct flash on a compact apart from perhaps adding a second flash which could be bounced off the ceiling or a wall to soften the shadows, the second flash being fired by a slave triggered by the camera flash but I have never tried it. Perhaps this is why Leica have added a shoe for a separate flash on the new CM. You could then bounce the additional flash but I don't know if the built in flash still goes off as a fill.
John
I have a T2 which I bought many years ago. It has been an excellent camera. My only criticism is that it can vignette a bit sometimes although I only notice it as a slight darkening of the corners on pictures of blue skies and I find that this can actually enhance a picture.
I have not had any problems with the flash which to me does an excellent job considering its low power. I cannot remember the guide number. It is good for automatic fill in flash too and I haven't had any problems with unwanted shadows apart from the usual effect of using direct flash on e.g. a subject in front of light coloured wall. I don't find this to be too much of a problem with it.
The only problem with the anti-red eye mode which I find is that people, including me as taker of the picture, can move in the time between the two flashes and when the camera actually makes the exposure and this can cause movement blur.
I don't think that there is any solution to the general problem of harsh shadows from direct flash on a compact apart from perhaps adding a second flash which could be bounced off the ceiling or a wall to soften the shadows, the second flash being fired by a slave triggered by the camera flash but I have never tried it. Perhaps this is why Leica have added a shoe for a separate flash on the new CM. You could then bounce the additional flash but I don't know if the built in flash still goes off as a fill.
John
martinmorley
New Member
I bought my T2 because a photographer I met had used one and never got red-eye. I had mine long enough to agree and then bought my partner one. As far as I know, neither camera has ever produced a photograph demonstrating this phenomenon. Because of this I have never used the red-eye reduction setting, it slows down picture taking still further and also eats up battery power. For those who think that red-eye might be film speed dependent, I used to use ISO100 colour neg but changed to ISO200 to cope with the vagaries of the British climate.
martin morley
martin morley