Gianluca,
For some reason, many Hassy lenses are poorly regarded, especially the 80/2.8 standard. Despite the Zeiss origin, the designs must be old. I haven't owned the 80/2.8 for a long time, but here is an interesting test page showing coma and general lack of focus:
http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~QI3Y-YSD/c3.htm
BTW, this Japanese fellow is a C/Y fanatic: Do you know anyone with the 200/2 Aposonner AND the 300/2.8 Tele-Apotessar? Holy Mackerel! He has a nice gallery, too.
I should add, the adapter makes sense in combination with the latest Zeiss offerings for Hasselblad, namely the Superachromat lenses. The MTF shows awesome performance and, of course, a killer image circle for C/Y users. The best thing is the (relative) affordability versus the C/Y APO glass. What was Contax smoking when they priced the 300/2.8???
For some reason, many Hassy lenses are poorly regarded, especially the 80/2.8 standard. Despite the Zeiss origin, the designs must be old. I haven't owned the 80/2.8 for a long time, but here is an interesting test page showing coma and general lack of focus:
http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~QI3Y-YSD/c3.htm
BTW, this Japanese fellow is a C/Y fanatic: Do you know anyone with the 200/2 Aposonner AND the 300/2.8 Tele-Apotessar? Holy Mackerel! He has a nice gallery, too.
I should add, the adapter makes sense in combination with the latest Zeiss offerings for Hasselblad, namely the Superachromat lenses. The MTF shows awesome performance and, of course, a killer image circle for C/Y users. The best thing is the (relative) affordability versus the C/Y APO glass. What was Contax smoking when they priced the 300/2.8???