Nevin:
I'm about 4 months ahead of you on acquiring a G2 kit. Your observations are excellent. My own workflow includes scanning slides (or negatives) using a 4000 ppi scanner (and yes, I have scanned at 5400 ppi as well). At either of these scanning levels is where the G2 shines. I am completely smitten with this machine and lens set. It is clearly superior to my MF CZ equipment (okay, I'm biased and that was a subjective comment). But, ON THE AVERAGE, I am getting better resolution - higher contrast (even at low light) pictures with the G2 over my other equipment. At 4x6, it'll be interesting to see if you have any comments. My own experience, again subjective, gives me noticably superior prints at 8x10 and beyond. We await your comparatives against the M7 (both user interface and resultant quality).
keoj
I'm about 4 months ahead of you on acquiring a G2 kit. Your observations are excellent. My own workflow includes scanning slides (or negatives) using a 4000 ppi scanner (and yes, I have scanned at 5400 ppi as well). At either of these scanning levels is where the G2 shines. I am completely smitten with this machine and lens set. It is clearly superior to my MF CZ equipment (okay, I'm biased and that was a subjective comment). But, ON THE AVERAGE, I am getting better resolution - higher contrast (even at low light) pictures with the G2 over my other equipment. At 4x6, it'll be interesting to see if you have any comments. My own experience, again subjective, gives me noticably superior prints at 8x10 and beyond. We await your comparatives against the M7 (both user interface and resultant quality).
keoj