Welcome to the Friendly Aisles!
DPRF is a spin-off of dpreview. We are a photography forum with people from all over the world freely sharing their knowledge and love of photography. Everybody is welcome, from beginners to the experienced professional. From smartphone to Medium Format.
DPRF is a community for everybody, every brand and every sensor format. Digital and film.
Enjoy this modern, easy to use software. Look also at our Reviews & Gallery!
I would advise at first to calibrate monitor. But in any way, I don't see anything critical in the post-processing.@adegroot: For my personal, individual taste, your picture looks not decent, but totally oversaturated and over-edited. I do only own an old DS1 Merrill, but generally, Foveon sensors do *not* have that "plastic look" like other CMOS. It's a *decent*, restrained colour rendering.
Johannes
Recently started a topic - https://dprforum.com/community/threads/processing-sigma-x3f-x3i-raws.912/ and I will try to gradually fill it with useful information.How do you get the colors so nice? I'm having color issues with my DPQ-0; would love to know your process. The one below took a lot of work to get it looking decent.
I'm graphics designer and photo pro and working since 30 years in front of a (every 200 hours calibrated) monitor, which may be more expensive than the whole windows setup of the one or the other contemporary.I would advise at first to calibrate monitor. But in any way, I don't see anything critical in the post-processing.
DNG files are easier to edit because they can be managed by any RAW editor that has support for the format. For example Adobe Lightroom, Adobe Photoshop...Anyways, my question is about processing a Quattro image. It's much easier to process a Merrill image than a Quattro image, whether shot in original raw or as a DNG
Thanks a lot, Sandy!!!PS to Serge, your work is gorgeous, inspirational!