Welcome to the Friendly Aisles!
DPRF is a spin-off of dpreview. We are a photography forum with people from all over the world freely sharing their knowledge and love of photography. Everybody is welcome, from beginners to the experienced professional. From smartphone to Medium Format.
DPRF is a community for everybody, every brand and every sensor format. Digital and film.
Enjoy this modern, easy to use software. Look also at our Reviews & Gallery!
Yes real. Well spotted, I’d not noticed that cloning repetition on the right that I think was to get rid of the rudder of the next aircraft in a row. I’ve not got easy access to the original at the moment.I would say... It's the real deal... with added space to the right.![]()
No it is real but although I took the picture, I was struck with how oddly model like that it seemed.Since you’re asking I have to conclude that it’s a model, otherwise you wouldn’t be asking. But you know that we know this, so following this logic of thought the inverse must be true. It’s real.
If I’m wrong sue me! LOL
How do people who make such incredible models dare risk wrecking them in a crash?!I suspect the rudder control horn indicates the likely answer. But nice.
I like to show these:
![]()
![]()
![]()
It was the angle of shot that made me think it was real. You'd have to be real low to get the shot of something smaller and under its' wing. But when I seen the cloned area I thought, hmm, you wouldn't go to the trouble of shifting the plane to the left if it was a model. That sealed the deal for me, but... it could have steered me wrong. lolYes real. Well spotted, I’d not noticed that cloning repetition on the right that I think was to get rid of the rudder of the next aircraft in a row. I’ve not got easy access to the original at the moment.