DPR Forum

Welcome to the Friendly Aisles!
DPRF is a spin-off of dpreview. We are a photography forum with people from all over the world freely sharing their knowledge and love of photography. Everybody is welcome, from beginners to the experienced professional. From smartphone to Medium Format.

DPRF is a community for everybody, every brand and every sensor format. Digital and film.
Enjoy this modern, easy to use software. Look also at our Reviews & Gallery!

User comments btil June 2003

Adrian,

Speaking as a Contax SLR user, I find the Yashica T4 Zoom to produce clean, alarmingly sharp images. It's a steal at $200. Bought it for my wife and, to ensure it would work in casual hands, took it for a spin under conditions of varying light and subject. All images were properly focussed and exposed without any locking and recentering antics. The package is light and handsome (for plastic). Film loading is effortless.

Low-light focus is impressive -- better than my Canon D30. The camera may also pop the flash once at a low power to handle the most adverse situations, like pitch black.

In contrast, I shied away from the Contax T series because of the cost and persistent complaints about autofocus.

There are several negatives about the T4 Zoom, mostly related to its P&S nature. Power-on delay is significant, as the zoom lens extends. Shutter lag is significant and annoying. The 28mm wide angle has obvious light falloff, even stopped down. The viewfinder is execrable, with ZERO eye-point and exact eye placement necessary. The lens is slow: 70/8 with overcast and ISO 100 means the flash goes off.

On balance, an excellent P&S. I don't use it personally because of the shutter lag and horrible VF. Except for falloff at 28mm, the optics produce Grade A images.
 
> This is the first, and most informal, installment of my C3 review. In this phase I wanted to do some general shooting, taking care to note what I was shooting, what I focused on, and how I locked focus and exposure. Also, I did some deliberate tests to see if the focusing indicator in the VF was accurate as I have had some focusing problems in the past.

Setup: Leica C3 loaded with fresh Fuji Superia 200 film. This is a typical film for me to use in general snapshot situations.

Environment: Balboa Park, San Diego California. Clear skies, sunny, from 2 to 4 o'clock.

Processing: Standard minilab C41 processing with picture CD (1536 X 1002 resolution - blah!). My scanner is having focusing problems so this is the best I can do for now. Photos uploaded via iPhoto, which down-sizes the images for web viewing (again, blah!).

Results: (see s&le images at http://homepage.mac.com/attinasi/PhotoAlbum18.html)

First, the C3 is a camera that I love to use. It starts up fast, focuses fast, zooms quickly and predictably, and is easy to handle. It looks cool too. I had ZERO focusing problems over 50 shots and all exposures were fine (not too surprising considering the film I used).

The first ex&le is a very sharp shot of my wife and daughter taken in heavy backlighting. The actual print is much smoother and sharper than the scan, but you can see that the focus and exposure are good and no flash or +EV compensation was required. Even in the print, however, there is the slightest fuzziness; my Minilux would have made a much better shot.

The second shot was a focus area test. The subject, the White Ghost Cactus, was about 35 feet away, the trees framing it were about 12 feet away. The focus area indicators were placed on the cactus with the tree very close to the sides of the indicators. As you can see, the cactus is in focus and the trees are not. This was zoomed in to 80mm. Strangely, the print shows much better detail in the cactus than the scan, which is 'over-exposed' (all scans are unmodified).

Third shot, again full-zoom, focused on a spindly flower stalk of a Century Plant (Agave). The detail is fantastic! The scan does not do it justice - the print is much much nicer. This one shows the C3 lens resolving very well, at 80mm and about 25 feet. Focus indicator was squarely on the 'trunk' of the stalk, with sky on either side, but there was a lot to focus on here.

Fourth shot is a simple close-up of an agave plant and some leaf-litter. This was shot at about 3 feet, at mid-zoom (about 50mm). Sharpness is good, not stellar, but good. I am starting to think that the C3 lens is optimized for larger distances, but i need to test that more carefully. Again, the scan is not doing the shot justice, but the quality is not what I would hope, nor what I would expect from the Minilux.

Summary: Well, my impression so far is of a camera that handles well, has excellent performance, and is easy and fun to use. The quality is not as high as I would like, and not what I would generally expect from a $300+ camera, but I will not draw any conclusions on that just yet - better film and more controlled experiments are required. Also, I am starting to think that my focus problems may be user-error as I did notice myself accidentally releasing the focus-lock while recomposing - I saw the lights go out and managed to re-lock and get the shot (nothing was moving so it was easy). Again, more testing is required to draw a conclusion.

Cheers! - marc
 
> Marc, I think you should be very pleased with your C3 pictures. The one of your wife and daughter especially is excellent and shows very good automatic exposure control in very tricky lighting - I'd have expected it to underexpose. I think one can sometimes expect too much from these P/S cameras!
 
41953.jpg
 
http://homepage.mac.com/phil.tko/PhotoAlbum8.html

The Museum of Glass photo was taken on XP2 with my C3. I had the film processed and ordered a picture disk (Fuji) at time of processing. I grabbed the green layer and did a bluish duotone.

http://homepage.mac.com/phil.tko/PhotoAlbum10.html
The Street Performer was shot on the same roll. The preview is bad but you can click on it to view the photo. It is looks soft I know. The original file is shraper though I wouldn't say it was tack sharp but I can still make out the detail in the brick work.

I love my C3. Would I prefer a Minilux. Yes. But the C3 is small and light enough to take with me everywhere... including on my bike when I go for training rides. It serves the purpose I bought it for, a P&S with a wide zoom which I intend to use for traveling. In the mean time I will experiment with how far I can push this camera and have a blast doing so!
 
Back
Top